Colorado Hands the Agreement Almost Everything, Including the Risk
Colorado does not require an LLC to have an operating agreement. It goes further than most states in saying so. C.R.S. § 7-80-102(11)(a) defines an operating agreement as any agreement of all of the members as to the affairs of a limited liability company and the conduct of its business. It adds that the operating agreement need not be in writing, except as otherwise provided in the article or required by a written operating agreement.
Section 7-80-108(5) then removes the last obstacle. An operating agreement is not subject to any statute of frauds.
What Colorado gives in return is unusual authority. Section 7-80-108(1)(a) provides that the agreement's provisions shall control over any provision of the article to the contrary, subject to three narrow exceptions. And § 7-80-108(4) states the legislative intent directly: it is the intent of this article to give the maximum effect to the principle of freedom of contract and to the enforceability of operating agreements. Section 7-80-108(1)(b) then binds the company itself to whatever its members agreed.
The document is never filed. Nothing goes to the Colorado Secretary of State. There is no form and no fee. Our Colorado operating agreement page covers the drafting side of the same question.
What Article 80 does when nothing was agreed
Colorado counts votes by head and money by capital. That is the reverse of several neighboring states, and it catches investors out. Section 7-80-401(1) provides that decisions about a limited liability company shall be made by a majority of the members, or by a majority of the managers if the company has them. Section 7-80-503 allocates profits and losses on the basis of the value of the contributions made by each member, as stated in the records the company must keep. And § 7-80-504 distributes cash the same way.
So a member who funded five percent of the capital has the same single vote as a member who funded ninety percent. That member still takes five percent of the money. Section 7-80-401(2) then requires the consent of each member for three things. Amending the articles. Amending the operating agreement. Or authorizing an act that is not in the ordinary course.
Section 7-80-403(2) repeats the point for officers. An officer may be given authority to act outside the ordinary course only with the consent of all of the members. Dissolution under § 7-80-801(1)(a) needs the agreement of all members.
The Colorado rule written specifically for one owner
Colorado wrote a definition for sole member companies that exists almost nowhere else. Section 7-80-102(11)(b) covers a limited liability company with only one member. There, operating agreement includes any writing as to the company's affairs and the conduct of its business signed by the sole member, without regard to whether such writing otherwise constitutes an agreement. It also includes any written agreement between the member and the company. And where a non member manager runs the business, it includes any agreement between the member and the company, whether written or not.
A signed memorandum describing how the business runs is therefore the operating agreement of a Colorado sole member LLC. That is a low bar, and a good reason to clear it deliberately rather than by accident. Whatever you signed is now the governing document. There is one clause a Colorado sole owner should always consider. Under § 7-80-108(2)(d.5), you cannot eliminate the ninety one day dissolution rule that § 7-80-801(1)(c)(I) sets. But you may expressly extend that rule to the first anniversary of the termination of the membership of the last remaining member.
Twelve months instead of three is a meaningful gift to an estate. Our single-member LLC guide covers the rest.
What Belongs in a Colorado Operating Agreement
The Colorado position in one table
| Question | Colorado answer |
|---|---|
| Required by statute? | No |
| Must it be written? | No, and no statute of frauds applies |
| Filed with the state? | No. No form, no filing, no fee |
| Governing act | Colorado Limited Liability Company Act, Title 7 Article 80 |
| Charging order exclusive? | The statute does not say so |
| Series LLCs | Not available under Article 80 |
| File.Business custom agreement | $97 flat |
Ten clauses carry the weight. Each one displaces something Article 80 has already decided.
1. Members, interests and the records that prove them
Name the members and fix the interests. Sections 7-80-503 and 7-80-504 both measure the default against the value of contributions, as stated in the records that § 7-80-408 requires. So the record keeping is part of the economics rather than an afterthought.
2. Contributions and later capital calls
Record contributions and their agreed values. Then decide what a failure to fund a call produces. The default allocation follows recorded contribution values, so an undocumented contribution is close to invisible.
3. Member managed or manager managed
Section 7-80-401(1) leaves decisions with a majority of the members, unless the company has managers. And § 7-80-402 lets managers be designated and removed by the consent of a majority of the members. Say who the managers are, how they are replaced, and what they may not do alone.
4. Voting weights and thresholds
Replace the head count in § 7-80-401(1) with the weighting the members actually intend. Then replace the unanimity in § 7-80-401(2) with something reachable. And define the ordinary course, because that phrase decides which of the two rules applies.
5. Allocation and distribution
This clause displaces §§ 7-80-503 and 7-80-504. Separate the allocation of taxable income from the timing of cash. Then say whether tax distributions are mandatory in a year when income is allocated but the cash stays in the business.
6. Transfers, assignees and consent
An assignee or transferee takes economic rights only. Add consent gates, a right of first refusal and a valuation route. Then treat involuntary transfers on divorce, death and judgment separately from voluntary sales. The Colorado charging order section makes an involuntary transfer more likely than in most states.
7. Admission, exit and buyout price
Section 7-80-401(3) lets persons about to be admitted amend the operating agreement by unanimous consent, effective immediately before their admission. That is the mechanism a financing round uses. Set the admission route and a buyout formula for departures, because the Act supplies neither.
8. Dissolution triggers and the payout order
Section 7-80-801(1) dissolves on the agreement of all members, on an event in the operating agreement, or after the company ceases to have members. Write your own triggers. Extend the ninety one day window if the company has one owner. And read our Colorado dissolution guide for the filing mechanics.
9. Federal election and Colorado filings
Say who signs Form 2553 or Form 8832 and who may revoke. Colorado follows the federal classification for income tax purposes, so the federal choice sets the state result. The agreement should name who prepares the returns.
10. Disputes, forum and amendment
Section 7-80-108(2.5)(c) gives the parties a chance to present evidence of the commercial setting, purpose and effect of a challenged clause. And § 7-80-108(2.5)(b) requires a court to save what it can of an invalid provision. Draft with that in mind: state the purpose of a hard clause in the clause itself. Then set an amendment threshold to replace the unanimity that § 7-80-401(2) imposes. Changing the public record is separate, covered in amending Colorado articles.
Create your Colorado operating agreement
We draft an operating agreement built around Colorado law and your ownership split, ready to sign. Or keep reading and draft your own.
The Colorado Charging Order Gap
This is the section Colorado owners are most often told the wrong thing about. Section 7-80-703 lets a judgment creditor apply to charge the membership interest. It then continues. The court may then or later appoint a receiver of the member's share of the profits and of any other money due. It may also make all other orders, directions, accounts and inquiries that the debtor member might have made.
To the extent charged, the creditor has only the rights of an assignee or transferee. The membership interest charged may be redeemed at any time before foreclosure. If the court directs a sale, the interest may be purchased without causing a dissolution.
Two things are missing from that section. There is no sentence declaring the charging order the exclusive remedy, which several states in this region include. And rather than barring foreclosure, the text contemplates it and tells you who may buy at the sale. Compare Alaska, whose AS 10.50.380(c) bars foreclosure, accounts and inquiries outright. Or Alabama, whose § 10A-5A-5.03(f) does the same. Colorado did neither.
The practical response is not a clever clause. A clever clause would be a restraint on a creditor who is not a party to your agreement, and § 7-80-108(2)(e) will not let the agreement impose on non parties without consent.
What works is structural. Keep the entity demonstrably separate. Document a genuine distribution policy rather than treating the company as a personal account. And think carefully before holding high value assets in a single member Colorado LLC on the assumption that a charging order is the end of the story.
How Far Colorado Lets You Modify Duties
Considerably further than California or Connecticut. Section 7-80-108(1.5) covers a member, manager or other person bound by the operating agreement who has duties to the company or to another member or manager. Those duties include fiduciary duties. The operating agreement may restrict or eliminate them, as long as any such provision is not manifestly unreasonable.
Elimination is on the table. The manifestly unreasonable standard is the only brake. And § 7-80-108(2.5)(c) gives the parties a right to show a court the commercial setting, purpose and effect of the clause before it is struck. Section 7-80-108(2)(d) preserves the obligation of good faith and fair dealing under § 7-80-404(3), allowing prescribed standards only if they are not unreasonable. And § 7-80-108(2)(b) stops the agreement unreasonably restricting the records rights that § 7-80-408 gives.
Section 7-80-108(3) then adds a writing requirement in one narrow place. No operating agreement may vary a requirement of the article that a particular action or provision be reflected in a writing, unless it is contained in a written operating agreement or another writing approved under one. So the general freedom is broad and the exceptions are few. The argument in any Colorado dispute will be about the words manifestly unreasonable, rather than about whether the clause was permitted at all.
Three Colorado Companies in Practice
Example one: Cherry Creek Orthodontic Partners, Denver
Four dentists formed an LLC. One contributed $780,000 for the build out and the chairs. The other three contributed $40,000 each. Nothing was signed. Under §§ 7-80-503 and 7-80-504 the money followed the contribution values. So the founding partner took about eighty seven percent of a $520,000 distribution. But under § 7-80-401(1) she held one vote out of four. And under § 7-80-401(2) any act outside the ordinary course needed her three colleagues as well. When the group wanted to open a second location, she funded it and could not control it.
Example two: Roaring Fork Trail Outfitters, Carbondale
Two members ran guided trips. One signed a memo in year one describing a sixty forty split and a $2,000 monthly draw. There was never a formal agreement. But § 7-80-108(5) removes the statute of frauds, and § 7-80-102(11)(a) accepts an unwritten agreement. So the memo plus three years of consistent conduct was the operating agreement, and it governed the split when the partnership ended. Colorado made the informal document count. It also meant neither member could later argue that a term they disliked was never agreed.
Example three: Front Range Storage Holdings, Loveland
A sole member held three self storage sites worth roughly $5.6 million in one Colorado LLC. A $310,000 personal judgment arrived. Under § 7-80-703 there is no exclusive remedy language, and the section expressly anticipates a court directed sale. So the creditor had arguments a creditor in Alaska or Alabama would not. The owner restructured into separate entities, brought a family trust in as a genuine second member, and adopted a written distribution policy. That combination, rather than a clause aimed at the creditor, is what changed the analysis.
Five Mistakes That Cost Colorado Members Money
Mistake 1: Letting an informal writing become the governing document
Colorado's generosity cuts both ways. Section 7-80-102(11)(b)(I) makes any writing signed by a sole member about the company's affairs the operating agreement. That holds whether or not it was meant as an agreement. An email to an accountant describing the ownership split can end up as the governing document. Decide what the document says on purpose.
Mistake 2: Skipping it because there is one member
The Colorado sole member has the weakest creditor position of the three states around it. It also has the most permissive definition of what counts as an agreement. That combination argues for a deliberate written document. It should name the successor, extend the dissolution window under § 7-80-108(2)(d.5), and record the distribution policy.
Mistake 3: Adding a member without using the admission mechanism
Section 7-80-401(3) exists precisely for this. Incoming members may by unanimous consent amend the operating agreement, effective immediately before their admission. Skip it and § 7-80-401(2) makes the amendment need the consent of each existing member. That is a different and harder conversation once the money is in.
Mistake 4: Trying to file it with the Secretary of State
There is no Colorado filing for an operating agreement, no form and no fee. Colorado also has no statement of authority filed with the Secretary of State under Article 80. The statement of authority Colorado recognizes is the real property instrument that C.R.S. § 38-30-172 creates. You record it with the county clerk and recorder. Your regular public filing is the Colorado periodic report, plus your registered agent record.
Mistake 5: Treating votes and money as the same question
This is the Colorado specific trap. Section 7-80-401(1) counts heads, and §§ 7-80-503 and 7-80-504 count dollars. Founders who assume both follow ownership are wrong in one direction or the other. The mismatch only surfaces when the majority funder and the majority of members want different things. Set both explicitly.
What Happens Financially When Article 80 Decides Instead
Colorado charges no penalty for the missing document. The cost lands elsewhere. The figures below are arithmetic on the facts stated rather than a survey of professional fees.
Start with control. On the Denver facts, the partner who funded $780,000 of a $900,000 build out held one vote in four. Colleagues who had contributed $40,000 apiece could outvote her on every ordinary course decision. The second exposure is the veto. Any act outside the ordinary course needs every member under § 7-80-401(2), so a single partner can stop a second location indefinitely.
The third is the creditor position. On the Loveland facts, a $310,000 judgment reached toward $5.6 million of property, because § 7-80-703 leaves the exclusive remedy question open. The fourth is the bank. Colorado banks ask a multi member company for the operating agreement at account opening. A business that trades through a personal account while governance is sorted has created the commingling record a plaintiff will use. If the entity is delinquent, handle reinstatement before the meeting.
What Colorado Banks and Counterparties Ask For
Expect a request for the filed Articles of Organization, the EIN letter, beneficial owner identification and the operating agreement. Article 80 has no Secretary of State statement of authority. So the agreement is where a lender reads signing power. For real property, a Colorado title company will look for a recorded statement of authority under C.R.S. § 38-30-172 as well. The operating agreement should say who is authorized to sign and record it.
The same file supports entity separateness. Courts asked to disregard a Colorado LLC look for separate accounts, real capital, decisions taken by the body the agreement names, and distributions that were authorized rather than assumed. Trading outside Colorado means producing the documents again for foreign qualification, usually with a Colorado certificate of good standing attached.
How File.Business Drafts Colorado Operating Agreements
We start by asking what informal writings already exist. Colorado may already treat one of them as the operating agreement. Then we work through contribution values, which drive the §§ 7-80-503 and 7-80-504 defaults. We set voting weights against the head count in § 7-80-401(1), and thresholds against the unanimity that § 7-80-401(2) imposes. We cover transfer and buyout terms, and the dissolution window extension that § 7-80-108(2)(d.5) permits. And we settle how far you want to use the duty modification that § 7-80-108(1.5) allows.
Free templates against a drafted Colorado agreement
The usual template failure in Colorado is a clause that assumes the charging order is the exclusive remedy, which § 7-80-703 does not say. Next to it sits a percentage table that never states which sections it displaces. A drafted agreement names the sections it overrides. It also states the commercial purpose of any hard clause, so that § 7-80-108(2.5)(c) has something to work with.
Trading under another name needs a Colorado trade name filing. Changing agents is covered in changing a Colorado registered agent, and the general framework is in operating agreement essentials.
Colorado Operating Agreement FAQ
Does Colorado require an LLC to have an operating agreement?
No. Nothing in the Colorado Limited Liability Company Act requires one. C.R.S. § 7-80-108(1)(a) provides that where the agreement is silent the article controls. That is the only consequence of not having one.
Does a Colorado operating agreement have to be in writing?
No. C.R.S. § 7-80-102(11)(a) says the operating agreement need not be in writing, except as otherwise provided in the article or required by a written operating agreement. And § 7-80-108(5) provides that it is not subject to any statute of frauds.
Do I file the operating agreement with the Colorado Secretary of State?
No. There is no filing, no form and no fee. The operating agreement is a private internal record. The Articles of Organization and the periodic report are the public filings.
How do Colorado LLC members vote if the agreement says nothing?
By head. C.R.S. § 7-80-401(1) gives the decision to a majority of the members, or a majority of the managers if the company has them. Section 7-80-401(2) then requires the consent of each member for three things: amending the articles, amending the operating agreement, or authorizing an act outside the ordinary course.
Is a charging order the exclusive remedy against a Colorado LLC interest?
The statute does not say so. C.R.S. § 7-80-703 allows a charging order, permits a receiver, and permits orders, directions, accounts and inquiries. It also refers to a sale directed by the court. Unlike Alaska and Alabama, Colorado includes no sentence declaring the charging order the sole and exclusive remedy.
Can a Colorado agreement eliminate fiduciary duties?
Largely, yes. C.R.S. § 7-80-108(1.5) allows duties, including fiduciary duties, to be restricted or eliminated by the operating agreement. The provision must not be manifestly unreasonable. The obligation of good faith and fair dealing under § 7-80-404(3) may not be eliminated.
What counts as the operating agreement of a one-member Colorado LLC?
More than you might expect. C.R.S. § 7-80-102(11)(b) includes any writing signed by the sole member as to the company's affairs and the conduct of its business. That holds without regard to whether the writing otherwise constitutes an agreement. It also includes any written agreement between the member and the company.
Need a custom Colorado Operating Agreement?
File.Business drafts Colorado-specific Operating Agreements at $97 flat: customized for single-member or multi-member structure, ownership percentages, capital contributions, tax election preferences, and management structure. Includes member-signature template and document-vault storage.
Doing this in Colorado specifically: our Colorado operating agreement page covers the drafting itself, including the split between head count voting and capital weighted money that Article 80 leaves in place.
Every statutory reference on this page was read in the Colorado Revised Statutes published by the Office of Legislative Legal Services. Sections are amended. Confirm the current text before you rely on it.
Disclosure. File.Business is a private filing service, not a government agency and not a law firm. We prepare and submit filings at your direction, and nothing on this page is legal or tax advice. Filing fees, deadlines, and statutory references are current as of the last-updated date shown above and can change. Confirm current requirements with the relevant state agency before you file.
