South Dakota Guards the Interest From Creditors and Leaves the Economics to You
South Dakota has hardened one section of its limited liability company act across four legislative sessions and left most of the rest alone. The section is SDCL 47-34A-504, amended in 2007, 2009, 2012 and 2013, and it now says what few states say: the charging order is the exclusive remedy, and no other remedy, including foreclosure on the distributional interest, is available to a judgment creditor.
Everything about the money inside the company still runs on the 1996 uniform text the state adopted in chapter 47-34A. So a South Dakota company is hard for an outside creditor to break into and easy for its own members to fall out over, because the statute divides profit by head count rather than by cheque size. The document fixes the second half without touching the first.
None of it is filed. The Secretary of State takes articles and an annual report and has no form, no channel and no fee for an operating agreement. General patterns are in the operating agreement essentials guide; the transactional page is South Dakota operating agreement.
What chapter 47-34A supplies when nobody wrote anything down
Profit splits by head. SDCL 47-34A-405(a) requires distributions before dissolution to be in equal shares. A member who funded the entire business and a member who funded none of it draw the same cheque. Published industry data on this state has the point backwards.
Votes are counted by head too. SDCL 47-34A-404.1(a) gives each member equal rights in management, with any matter decided by a majority of the members. Two thirds of the capital can be outvoted by two thirds of the people.
Twelve decisions need everyone. SDCL 47-34A-404.1(c) sends a fixed list to unanimous consent. Two entries matter most: making an interim distribution, and using company property to redeem an interest under a charging order.
Nobody is paid for working. SDCL 47-34A-403(d) says a member is not entitled to remuneration for services, except reasonable compensation for winding up. The founder at sixty hours a week and the passive investor sit on the same footing.
Duties can be trimmed further than in most states. SDCL 47-34A-103(c) lets the agreement, if not manifestly unreasonable, restrict information rights, reduce the duty of care, and alter any other fiduciary duty. Subsection (d) makes that reasonableness a question for the court, judged as of the day the term entered the agreement.
One member, one interest, and a statute that names that case
Most charging order statutes say nothing about the sole owner, and that silence is where single-member protection usually collapses. South Dakota closed it. SDCL 47-34A-504(g) states that the section applies to single member companies as well as multi-member ones, subsection (e) rules out foreclosure and even rules out a court order for directions, accounts and inquiries, and subsection (f) denies any creditor a route to the company's own property.
That defence assumes there is a company, distinct from its owner, whose distributions can be charged. The evidence for that is the agreement, the contribution ledger, the resolutions and the bank record, none of which a sole owner produces by accident. Federal and banking treatment is in the single-member LLC guide, with state detail on the South Dakota single-member LLC page.
Ten Clauses, Drafted Against the Text of Chapter 47-34A
SDCL 47-34A-103(a) lets all members regulate the affairs of the company and govern relations among themselves. Subsection (b) marks the short list they cannot cross. These ten clauses live inside it.
South Dakota at a glance
| Question | What SDCL chapter 47-34A says |
|---|---|
| Governing act | South Dakota Limited Liability Company Act, SDCL 47-34A-101 and following |
| Required by statute? | No. Section 47-34A-103 is permissive |
| Form accepted | Written or oral. The statute says it need not be in writing |
| Filed with the state? | Never. No form, no submission, no fee |
| Default voting | Equal rights per member, majority of the members, section 47-34A-404.1 |
| Default distributions | Equal shares regardless of contribution, section 47-34A-405 |
| Withdrawal | Allowed at any time, and the member becomes a transferee with no buyout |
| Charging order | Exclusive. Foreclosure and court-ordered inquiries are unavailable, section 47-34A-504 |
| Series | Permitted, with separate records and a certificate of designation, section 47-34A-702 |
| State fees you do pay | $150 to form, $55 for the annual report. Nothing for the agreement |
1. Members, percentages, and the word the statute uses
List every member with a stated percentage and use the statute's vocabulary. A distributional interest is the right to receive distributions and nothing more, and it is what a transferee holds. South Dakota publishes no member information, so this schedule is the only record a bank or a buyer can rely on.
2. Contributions, and the rule that ignores them
Record the form, date and agreed value of every contribution, then note what SDCL 47-34A-405 does with that record on its own: nothing. Capture promised contributions as well as delivered ones, and set the consequence of a missed call, because forgiving a contribution obligation is a unanimous decision.
3. Member or manager management, and who may sign
A South Dakota company is member-managed unless the agreement says otherwise, and SDCL 47-34A-301 then makes each member an agent whose ordinary-course signature binds it. Name who may sign, for which categories, up to what amount. In a manager-managed company, set the term, compensation and removal procedure.
4. Weighting the vote, and pruning the unanimity list
Two moves in opposite directions. Tie votes to ownership if that is the intention, because SDCL 47-34A-404.1(a) counts heads. Then work through the twelve-item list in subsection (c). Interim distributions sit on it, so one objector in a five-member company can block every payment.
5. Allocations, distributions and a tax draw
Separate the allocation of taxable income from the distribution of cash, then displace the equal-shares rule with the split the members agreed. Add a mandatory tax distribution, since members of a company taxed as a partnership owe tax on allocated income whether or not the cash arrived.
6. Transfers, and the transferee the statute already limits
SDCL 47-34A-503 already stops a transferee who does not become a member from managing, demanding information or inspecting records. Add consent requirements, a right of first refusal, permitted estate transfers, and a mandatory purchase on death, divorce or bankruptcy. Also grant the redemption permission subsection 504(c)(3) requires.
7. Admission, withdrawal, and the exit the statute withholds
Under SDCL 47-34A-602 a member may withdraw at any time, and SDCL 47-34A-603 then treats that person as a transferee: governance gone, economics intact, nothing payable. Neither side gets what it wants. Write the buyout, the valuation method, the instalment terms and the interest rate, or accept a permanent silent holder.
8. Dissolution, and the part you cannot vary
SDCL 47-34A-801 lists the dissolution events, including a decree that the economic purpose is likely to be unreasonably frustrated. SDCL 47-34A-103(b)(4) blocks the agreement from varying the winding-up requirement in those judicial cases. Note the absence: a member leaving does not dissolve the company. The filing sits on the South Dakota dissolution page, and a struck company works through reinstatement.
9. Tax classification, and the filings that follow
Record the federal classification and test the allocations against it, since an S corporation election cannot carry preferred returns or special allocations. South Dakota levies no personal or corporate income tax, so the federal election does nearly all the work and the recurring state obligation is the annual report.
10. Amendments, disputes, and the copy every member can demand
Set the amendment vote, because SDCL 47-34A-404.1(c)(1) otherwise requires every member, and take signatures even though a new member is deemed to assent. Add the forum. Then keep the file: SDCL 47-34A-408(d) lets any member demand a copy of the written agreement at the company's expense. Store it with the articles and any South Dakota articles of amendment.
Form your LLC
If you would rather not do this yourself, we prepare the articles, check name availability with the state, and file it for you. Or keep reading and file it on your own. This guide covers everything you need either way.
How Far the South Dakota Creditor Bar Actually Reaches
Read SDCL 47-34A-504 in order. Subsection (a) lets a court charge the distributional interest after notice to the company. Subsection (b) makes the order a lien. Subsection (c) allows redemption by the debtor, by other members using their own property, or with company property where the operating agreement permits it.
Subsection (e) is the one people quote and rarely finish. It calls the charging order the exclusive remedy, then adds that no other remedy is available, naming two: foreclosure on the distributional interest, and a court order for directions, accounts and inquiries the debtor member might have made. Most states that call the charging order exclusive still allow foreclosure. South Dakota removed it, and removed the discovery tools that travel with it.
Two drafting consequences follow. The redemption route in subsection (c)(3) is a permission the statute withholds unless the agreement grants it, and SDCL 47-34A-404.1(c)(8) then makes exercising it unanimous unless the agreement moves that threshold. And none of this touches a judgment against the company itself, which reaches company assets directly.
Separateness, and What a South Dakota Court Is Actually Weighing
South Dakota courts disregard an entity where it has been used to defeat public convenience, justify wrong, protect fraud or defend crime. The factual inquiry runs on familiar ground: capitalisation at formation, whether the entity kept the formalities it set for itself, whether funds and assets stayed apart, and whether distributions were declared or simply drawn.
The document does concrete work there. A signed agreement fixes what the formalities are. A contribution ledger answers the capitalisation question with a number and a date. An authority clause explains why a particular person signed a particular contract.
The reverse is also true. An agreement imposing obligations the company never performs is worse than a short one that matches practice, because the claimant now has a written standard to measure the failure against. Where an owner runs several related companies, shared accounts and unpapered intercompany transfers are what a single-enterprise argument is built from, and a current certificate of good standing for each entity is the cheapest evidence of maintenance.
Five Mistakes South Dakota Owners Keep Making
Three come from believing the marketing about South Dakota asset protection. Two come from the money rules nobody reads.
Mistake 1: Using a template drafted for the revised uniform act
Most templates are written against the 2006 revised act, which numbers its sections differently and handles dissociation differently. South Dakota kept the 1996 structure and then amended it where nobody else did. A template citing section 503 for the charging order is pointing at the transferee section here, and one promising a fair value buyout on withdrawal is describing a rule this state does not have.
Mistake 2: Treating the creditor statute as a substitute for records
SDCL 47-34A-504 is strong, and what it protects is an interest in a company. A creditor arguing that the company and the owner are the same person is not asking to foreclose on the interest, it is asking the court to ignore the entity. The statute has nothing to say to that. The signed agreement, the separate account and the ledger do.
Mistake 3: Assuming money follows the cheque book
SDCL 47-34A-405(a) is four lines long and it says equal shares. Founders who contributed $180,000 and $20,000 and call themselves ninety-ten owners have no document making that true. It compounds on the tax side, where a partnership return allocating ninety-ten sits against a statute distributing fifty-fifty.
Mistake 4: Looking for the filing or the fee
There is neither. The agreement is never delivered to the Secretary of State, appears in no fee schedule and is not part of the formation packet. What South Dakota charges is $150 to form and $55 for the annual report. Filing it publicly would also expose the member schedule and the contribution values.
Mistake 5: Leaving the twelve-item unanimity list untouched
SDCL 47-34A-404.1(c) requires every member's consent for twelve things, and most agreements never mention it. Interim distributions and the redemption of a charged interest are both on it. In a four-member company that hands each member a veto over being paid, and hands a member under a charging order a veto over the company solving it.
Three South Dakota Companies and the Clause That Was Missing
Composite cases built from the patterns that recur under chapter 47-34A.
Example 1: A Sioux Falls fabricator where equal shares met unequal money
Three members opened a metal fabrication shop. One contributed $240,000 of equipment and a building lease; the others put in $30,000 each and their labour. They agreed verbally on eighty-ten-ten and distributed that way for two years. When the majority member proposed admitting a fourth, the other two refused and pointed at SDCL 47-34A-405(a). Roughly $118,000 had gone to the wrong person under the statutory rule, and there was no written agreement to answer with.
Example 2: A Rapid City holding company and a judgment that went nowhere
A single owner held four rental properties in one company. A personal injury judgment of $410,000 was entered against the owner and the creditor applied for a charging order. Under subsection (e) it could not foreclose or obtain accounts and inquiries, and under subsection (f) it could not reach the buildings. It could sit on distributions. With no agreement adopted, there was no discretionary distribution clause and no authority to redeem the charged interest with company cash.
Example 3: A Brookings agtech company where one founder walked
Four founders built a soil-sensor business. One left after an argument about a distribution. SDCL 47-34A-602 allowed the withdrawal, and SDCL 47-34A-603 turned that member into a transferee: no vote, no information rights, no payment due. The remaining three then had a silent holder of a quarter of the economics who could not be removed, blocked nothing, and collected on every distribution for six years.
The Financial Consequence of Leaving It to the Statute
South Dakota imposes no penalty for having no operating agreement. There is no fine and no compliance event. These are the amounts the defaults move.
The equal-shares reallocation. A company distributing $300,000 a year among three members who believe they are eighty-ten-ten is $150,000 a year away from the statutory answer. Over three years that is $450,000 in dispute, with a course of dealing as the only evidence on the other side.
The buyout that does not exist. A withdrawing member keeps the economics permanently. On a business throwing off $200,000 a year with a twenty-five percent holder, that is $50,000 a year leaving the company for someone contributing nothing, indefinitely.
The deadlock on distributions. Interim distributions are unanimous by default. Two years of withheld cash in a profitable company means members paying tax on income they never received, roughly $37,000 a year out of pocket for a top-bracket member on a $100,000 allocation.
The costs the state does charge. Formation is $150 and the annual report is $55, so nothing in the calendar prompts anyone to open the governance file. A closing that needs a certificate of good standing is often the first review in years, and trading across the border adds foreign qualification and a second calendar.
How File.Business Drafts a South Dakota Operating Agreement
The intake starts where South Dakota diverges from what founders assume. First the money: equal shares under SDCL 47-34A-405 unless the document says otherwise, so the percentage split has to be written before anything else makes sense. Second the exit: withdrawal at will with no purchase obligation on either side, so the buyout has to be built rather than adjusted.
From there the work runs through the twelve-item unanimity list, the express permission subsection 504(c)(3) requires before company property can redeem a charged interest, signing authority under SDCL 47-34A-301, and duty modifications drafted inside the manifest-unreasonableness boundary. Delivery includes a member and contribution schedule formatted for a bank's beneficial ownership file, signature pages, and a written consent adopting the agreement. Adjacent work runs alongside: registered agent coverage, agent changes and trade name filings. The flat fee is $99 and no state fee attaches, because there is no filing.
Template or drafted document
A single-member company with no outside capital can run on a careful template written to chapter 47-34A, provided it carries the redemption permission in subsection 504(c)(3) and a distribution clause that is discretionary rather than automatic. Every multi-member company earns a drafted document.
The test takes one search. Open the template and look for the word equal. If the distribution clause does not displace equal shares, and there is no buyout attached to withdrawal, the two largest numbers in the relationship are being left to a statute written in 1996 for somebody else's company.
South Dakota Operating Agreement FAQ
Does South Dakota require an LLC operating agreement?
No. SDCL 47-34A-103(a) provides that all members may enter into an operating agreement, which need not be in writing, to regulate the affairs of the company and govern relations among the members, managers and company. It is permissive, and the Secretary of State never asks to see it.
Do I file the operating agreement with the South Dakota Secretary of State?
No. There is no form for it, no filing channel and no fee, because it is a private contract among the members. The state fees you do pay are $150 to form the company and $55 for the annual report.
Can a creditor foreclose on a South Dakota membership interest?
No. SDCL 47-34A-504(e) makes the charging order the exclusive remedy and states that no other remedy is available, naming foreclosure on the distributional interest and a court order for directions, accounts and inquiries.
Does South Dakota charging order protection cover a single-member LLC?
Yes. SDCL 47-34A-504(g) provides that the section applies to single member limited liability companies in addition to companies with more than one member. Most states leave the sole-owner case unaddressed, and courts have then read the protection narrowly.
How are profits split in a South Dakota LLC with no operating agreement?
Equally. SDCL 47-34A-405(a) requires any distributions made before dissolution and winding up to be in equal shares. Contributions do not change the result, so a member who funded the business receives the same amount as one who funded none of it.
What happens if a member quits a South Dakota LLC?
The member becomes a transferee. SDCL 47-34A-602 allows withdrawal at any time by express will, and SDCL 47-34A-603 ends the governance rights while leaving the economic interest in place. The company does not dissolve and has no obligation to buy the interest back.
Can a South Dakota operating agreement change fiduciary duties?
Partly. SDCL 47-34A-103(b) prevents an agreement from eliminating the duty of loyalty or the obligation of good faith and fair dealing. Subsection (c) then allows it, if not manifestly unreasonable, to reduce the duty of care and alter any other fiduciary duty.
Need a custom South Dakota Operating Agreement?
File.Business drafts South Dakota-specific Operating Agreements at $99 flat: customized for single-member or multi-member structure, ownership percentages, capital contributions, tax election preferences, and management structure. Includes member-signature template and document-vault storage.
Doing this in South Dakota specifically: South Dakota operating agreement covers the state detail. There is no state form and no fee, because the document is never filed.
Every statutory statement above was read in the sources below. Confirm the current text with the agency or the legislature before acting on it.
Disclosure. File.Business is a private filing service, not a government agency and not a law firm. We prepare and submit filings at your direction, and nothing on this page is legal or tax advice. Filing fees, deadlines, and statutory references are current as of the last-updated date shown above and can change. Confirm current requirements with the relevant state agency before you file.
